I watched the first episode last night, and I have to say, I was very impressed. It didn't have many big, dramatic moments, apart from the beginning and end, but given that it's going to take a little while to establish the characters and the world, I think that's a good thing. It's best to let us get to know the characters before the horrible things that happen in the books begin. The acting was very good, and the set and costume design makes it very obvious how much HBO has spent on this series.
Among the cast, of particular note, I thought, were Maisie Williams as Arya, who seems to have perfectly captured the impish, tomboyish nature of the character. Kit Harrington as Jon has a pleasing level of detachment and resentment on account of being the bastard, and the fantastically named Nikolaj Coster-Waldau is both suitably attractive and arrogant as Jaime. Predictably, Sean Bean has the honourability of Eddard sorted out, and Emilia Clarke seems good so far as Daenerys. She certainly was believable as the little girl lost in the world, being used as a pawn by her brother; it'll be interesting to see how she handles the transition to ULTIMATE BADASSERY that the character undergoes. And it would be remiss of me not to mention Peter Dinklage as the bitter dwarf Tyrion, who has taken one of the novels' most interesting characters and looks set to make his screen incarnation just as memorable. If it seems like I've singled out half the cast, well, what can I say? It's a damn fine cast.
As I said, the money HBO's spent is clearly on display throughout. What visual effects there are, are well done; with the exception of a rather obvious matte painting in the crypts beneath Winterfell, which was a bit of a shame. I'm pleased to say that, even when things differ significantly from how I pictured them, they still work. In particular, the armour of the Kingsguard looks little like how I imagined it, but still looks like it belongs in this world. As far as set design goes, I liked the difference in colour palettes used between Winterfell and Pentos; in the former, the colours are largely shades of grey, fairly understated and washed-out, reflecting the Stark words, "Winter is coming", and the resignation and dedication to duty implied therein. By contrast, the Free City of Pentos is bright and vivid, an indication of how much livelier life is over there. For me, at least, given that Daenerys is my favourite character in the series, I like to think of the bright colours as representative of her vitality and dynamism, though it may not yet be on show in the first episode.
All in all, a very strong premiere which bodes well for the rest of the series. Time will tell, but I may well have a new favourite TV show. Which makes it all the more pleasing that it's already been renewed for a second season.
"We read fantasy to find the colours again, I think. To taste strong spices and hear the songs the sirens sang." -- GRRM
Tuesday, 19 April 2011
Sunday, 10 April 2011
Winter is Coming
HBO have released the first fifteen minutes of Game of Thrones as a preview of the series. It's looking very, very good. The Others, fortunately, as they would have been quite easy to get wrong, seem to be as underwear-soilingly terrifying as they are in the books. Admittedly she had very little screentime, but Maisie Williams (Arya) in particular looks like she's embodied the character very well. Looking forward to seeing more of her when the series starts. If I'm going to be critical, I have to say that I would have loved to see something of Daenerys, but I guess I'll just have to wait.
Just over a week to go...
Just over a week to go...
Friday, 4 March 2011
Fire and Blood
After yesterday's terrible news, it appears karma is working in full force to balance things out, as it turns out that, at long last, A Dance with Dragons has a release date. This book has been in the making for nearly six years, so to say it's highly-anticipated would be a gross understatement. However, GRRM's reassured us that it's really bloody long, and if the events at the end of A Feast for Crows are any indication, this book should be something truly spectacular.
Winter is coming. And so are the dragons.

Update: it gets better. HBO have released a new trailer for Game of Thrones. We're getting a TV series based on the first novel in the series, and the latest novel in the series, within a few months of each other. Excited? I am.
Valar morghulis.
Winter is coming. And so are the dragons.
Update: it gets better. HBO have released a new trailer for Game of Thrones. We're getting a TV series based on the first novel in the series, and the latest novel in the series, within a few months of each other. Excited? I am.
Valar morghulis.
Thursday, 3 March 2011
Is nothing sacred?
Basically, they're planning to make sequels and prequels to Blade Runner. Excuse me a moment.
This is a travesty. Blade Runner is one of the greatest science fiction films ever made, and they're planning to make a *shudder* franchise out of it. If this happens, brace yourself for a very long rant on this here blog. I may also need to "retire" the people involved in destroying this stunning work of art.
This is a travesty. Blade Runner is one of the greatest science fiction films ever made, and they're planning to make a *shudder* franchise out of it. If this happens, brace yourself for a very long rant on this here blog. I may also need to "retire" the people involved in destroying this stunning work of art.
Monday, 28 February 2011
Oscars 2011 and Superman
As most of you will know, the Oscars were last night, and there were very few surprises. The King's Speech took home Best Picture, Actor, Original Screenplay, and Director. I think everyone saw the first two coming; it's a bit of a surprise that Director didn't go to David Fincher for The Social Network, but it should have been Christoher Nolan's award anyway, so who cares. Toy Story 3 won Best Animated Feature, because, let's be honest, it's not called the Pixar Award for nothing. Inception, happily, did rather well, winning as many awards as Speech, albeit in the technical categories: Cinematography, Visual Effects, Sound Mixing, and Sound Editing. I suppose science fiction has to be happy with what it can get, which tends to be the technical awards. Sigh.
In light of there being almost nothing interesting to talk about with regards to the Oscars, let's talk about a rumour that I desperately want to be true. Apparently, Zack Snyder wants Viggo Mortensen to be General Zod in the upcoming Superman reboot, working title The Man of Steel. That's right. Aragorn could be Zod. Granted, this is very much a rumour at this stage, with nothing whatsoever to suggest it'll actually happen, not least that, in the past, it has been denied that Zod would be the villain. However, Snyder supposedly wants Mortensen for the role, and I think he'd be very good in it. While he tends not play out-and-out villains, he was excellent when playing morally grey, at best, characters in A History of Violence (which was also a comic book adaptation) and Eastern Promises. Obviously, the fact that they've said Zod won't be the villain is a problem, but I'm not sure who else it could be. Other than Zod, the only obvious choice is Lex Luthor, but he was the villain in three of the last five Superman films, four if you count Superman II. As I said, this is pure rumour at this stage, but it's still interesting to talk about.
Come on, Aragorn could be General Zod! Who doesn't want that?
In light of there being almost nothing interesting to talk about with regards to the Oscars, let's talk about a rumour that I desperately want to be true. Apparently, Zack Snyder wants Viggo Mortensen to be General Zod in the upcoming Superman reboot, working title The Man of Steel. That's right. Aragorn could be Zod. Granted, this is very much a rumour at this stage, with nothing whatsoever to suggest it'll actually happen, not least that, in the past, it has been denied that Zod would be the villain. However, Snyder supposedly wants Mortensen for the role, and I think he'd be very good in it. While he tends not play out-and-out villains, he was excellent when playing morally grey, at best, characters in A History of Violence (which was also a comic book adaptation) and Eastern Promises. Obviously, the fact that they've said Zod won't be the villain is a problem, but I'm not sure who else it could be. Other than Zod, the only obvious choice is Lex Luthor, but he was the villain in three of the last five Superman films, four if you count Superman II. As I said, this is pure rumour at this stage, but it's still interesting to talk about.
Come on, Aragorn could be General Zod! Who doesn't want that?
Sunday, 20 February 2011
Paul
Pretty damn well, fortunately. Paul is a very good film. Ok, it's not the type that's going to win awards, but it's clever, the cast are excellent, and it's very, very funny. For those who don't know, it's about Graeme and Clive, a pair of geeks who go on holiday to Comic-Con, and subsequently on a road trip of the USA's UFO hotspots. En route, they meet an alien called Paul, who enlists them to help him escape the government. Hijinks ensue. While a lot of the jokes are accessible to anyone, your enjoyment of this film will be a whole lot greater if you have at least a working knowledge of Star Wars, Indiana Jones, and the films of Steven Spielberg. There are references to geek culture all over the place, with Star Wars unsurprisingly getting the greatest number. There are plenty of jokes relating to it that are funny in their own right, but become much funnier if you realise where that particular line is from. Fans of Spielberg will find plenty to engage them here, with a joke involving Paul's involvement with E.T. being one of the film's best. In a similar fashion, a famous line from Aliens gets quoted at one point, and given the context it appears in here, it's much funnier if you know where it's originally from.
The start of the film is, unfortunately, the weakest bit. The sequence at Comic-Con is nice, but the majority of the jokes are about whether Graeme and Clive are gay or not. There are jokes about this subject throughout the film, but they're particularly numerous at the beginning, and get old fast. Fortunately, once Paul shows up, the film becomes a blast. There are chase scenes aplenty, interspersed with sequences of simply Graeme and Clive getting to know Paul. It says a lot that the latter are just as engaging as the former. This is largely because the character of Paul, so central to the film, is, fortunately, wonderful; the CG is convincing, and Seth Rogen does a fantastic job with the voice work. Not what you typically expect from a screen alien, he's been on Earth a long time, and enjoys the simple things in life: swearing, smoking, barbecues, and more swearing. It's a testament to how well the character is written that you end up really liking him very quickly, when he could easily have ended up feeling like a bit of a jerk.
Pegg and Frost are on predictably good form, essentially playing themselves as they often do. The rest of the cast are on fine form as well, with the standouts being Jason Bateman as the FBI agent in pursuit of Paul (to whom is given, in my opinion, the funniest Star Wars reference), and Sigourney Weaver. To give away her exact role in the plot would be spoilerish, but suffice it to say that she's as good as she always is, and unsurprisingly, it's in the context of her that Aliens gets quoted.
It may start off slow, but Paul quickly ends up becoming a very fun, if very silly, time at the cinema. It proves that Simon Pegg and Nick Frost don't need Edgar Wright helping them out to deliver quality comedy; this is particularly nice considering that it's the first time Frost has written something for the screen. I hope he continues to do so. They may essentially be playing themselves, but it's worked so far, and it continues to work here. There's something in Paul for everyone, but it's fitting that, since it begins at Comic-Con, the people who will probably enjoy it the most are the type of people who would actually go to Comic-Con.
Wednesday, 26 January 2011
Oscar Nominations
It's that time of year again; the Oscar nominations for 2011 have been announced, and accordingly, I feel I should make my opinion on them known, for the three of you who will actually read this.
For the most part, the Academy's decisions look pretty good, if predictable. Sadly, I have yet to see several of the films that have been nominated, largely because getting to the cinema is awkward and expensive. That said, there aren't really any surprises in the Best Picture category; everything that has been nominated was fairly predictably going to get nominated. It's nice to see Toy Story 3 get a nod, even if it almost certainly won't win. I haven't seen The King's Speech yet, but considering the number of nominations it has, and the general buzz about the film, I'm predicting it to take home the Best Picture award.

For the most part, the Academy's decisions look pretty good, if predictable. Sadly, I have yet to see several of the films that have been nominated, largely because getting to the cinema is awkward and expensive. That said, there aren't really any surprises in the Best Picture category; everything that has been nominated was fairly predictably going to get nominated. It's nice to see Toy Story 3 get a nod, even if it almost certainly won't win. I haven't seen The King's Speech yet, but considering the number of nominations it has, and the general buzz about the film, I'm predicting it to take home the Best Picture award.
Now, as I said, I haven't seen The King's Speech, so what follows is not exactly fair. All the same, I think it's a damn shame that Inception isn't going to win Best Picture. The King's Speech is certainly more the Academy's kind of film, being small-scale and talky rather than the effects-based action blockbuster that Inception was, and it may indeed be the better film. For me, however, that's doesn't matter, because I will always champion quality science fiction, because frankly, somebody has to; the Academy doesn't care for it as a rule. I thought it had a very good shot at the award, and while it has a Best Picture nomination, it hasn't been nominated for Best Editing, and statistically speaking, you need at least a nomination in Best Editing to win Best Picture; the last time the Best Picture winner didn't have an Editing nod was in 1981. So, Inception probably won't win, which is a real pity.
Fortunately, it's up for a whole lot of other awards, with particularly deserving nominations in Best Original Screenplay and Best Visual Effects; if there's any justice it will win the latter, at least. Nolan's lack of a Best Director nomination is pretty inexplicable, however; we can probably put this down to the Academy's snobbishness regarding science fiction and summer blockbusters.
For me, the other extremely disappointing aspect of this year's awards selection is the total absence of nominations for Scott Pilgrim vs. The World, which is definitely up there with the year's best films. Apparently the Academy doesn't like niche, geeky, magically realistic films which no one went to see. Who knew? Still, it would have been nice to see it get a Visual Effects nomination, and it really deserves a nod for Best Adapted Screenplay. Its absence isn't a surprise, because it really isn't the Academy's kind of film, but it's disappointing nonetheless.
I realise I only talked about a few films and a few categories, but I talked about what I'm most interested in. As I said, most of the nominations aren't surprising, and therefore there's not a great deal to say about them; I thought it would be more interesting to talk about things which didn't get nominated and should have been. We'll find out which film wins which award on February 27th; check back here for commentary on the awards themselves.
Thursday, 20 January 2011
The Dark Knight Rises: Speculation
With news beginning to arrive on the sequel to The Dark Knight, it's natural that people are going to wonder what the plot will be. With the recent announcement that Anne Hathaway will be Catwoman and that Tom Hardy will be Bane, there's going to be a lot of internet speculation and I thought I'd get my opinions out there. TDKR is probably my most anticipated film at the moment, with the possible exception of The Hobbit.
Catwoman's involvement in the story is a pretty logical one. Following the events of the last movie, Bruce is even more emotionally damaged than before and is, apart from Alfred, completely alone. A new love interest would be a natural addition to the story, and considering that Catwoman is a criminal, it would probably make Bruce question his loyalties and motivations, which would definitely be interesting to see.
For me, however, the more intriguing announcement is that Bane will be in the film. I assume he'll be the main villain, with Catwoman as the secondary one, like Scarecrow in Batman Begins or Two-Face in TDK. Now, the most notable Joker story is The Killing Joke, which was a big influence on TDK in terms of plot and themes. The most notable Bane story is Knightfall, which also happens to be one of Batman's greatest and most crushing defeats. I think it's safe to assume that Knightfall will influence TDKR in some way, which of course begs the question: will we see this happen?

It would certainly fit with the bleakness of the overall story so far, but I wonder if it'll be too much. The film is called The Dark Knight Rises, after all, not Broken Bat. If they introduce the possibility for a successor to Bruce it could make sense, but it'll still be incredibly depressing even by the standards already set.
I suppose we'll just have to wait and see.
Catwoman's involvement in the story is a pretty logical one. Following the events of the last movie, Bruce is even more emotionally damaged than before and is, apart from Alfred, completely alone. A new love interest would be a natural addition to the story, and considering that Catwoman is a criminal, it would probably make Bruce question his loyalties and motivations, which would definitely be interesting to see.
For me, however, the more intriguing announcement is that Bane will be in the film. I assume he'll be the main villain, with Catwoman as the secondary one, like Scarecrow in Batman Begins or Two-Face in TDK. Now, the most notable Joker story is The Killing Joke, which was a big influence on TDK in terms of plot and themes. The most notable Bane story is Knightfall, which also happens to be one of Batman's greatest and most crushing defeats. I think it's safe to assume that Knightfall will influence TDKR in some way, which of course begs the question: will we see this happen?
It would certainly fit with the bleakness of the overall story so far, but I wonder if it'll be too much. The film is called The Dark Knight Rises, after all, not Broken Bat. If they introduce the possibility for a successor to Bruce it could make sense, but it'll still be incredibly depressing even by the standards already set.
I suppose we'll just have to wait and see.
Monday, 3 January 2011
Your Highness
As a long time fan of fantasy fiction, and simultaneously a critic of much the genre has to offer (see previous post), I often find myself in an awkward position. I claim to love something, and yet not only concede that most of it is terrible, but indeed make a point of criticising it myself. The troubles I have with the fantasy genre are many and varied, and a subject for another day; however, because of my situation, I tend to find myself latching onto and ferociously humping the leg of any example of the genre that looks promising. Accordingly, I present the trailer for Your Highness, a film I only heard about recently but which has become one of my most anticipated films of 2011.
It looks a bit like a stoner, more sweary version of The Princess Bride, the best fantasy movie not to star Luke Skywalker or Frodo Baggins. Sure, the humour is crude and silly, but there's a big difference between silly and stupid, and crude humour is fine by me so long as it's funny. And this looks very funny. It looks to be a smart, affectionate parody of typical fantasy tropes as well as a stoner buddy movie, and I think it looks a lot of fun. It won't be winning any awards, but sometimes all you want is a good time at the movies, and I suspect this will provide that.
For the red-band trailer, head over to Empire.
It looks a bit like a stoner, more sweary version of The Princess Bride, the best fantasy movie not to star Luke Skywalker or Frodo Baggins. Sure, the humour is crude and silly, but there's a big difference between silly and stupid, and crude humour is fine by me so long as it's funny. And this looks very funny. It looks to be a smart, affectionate parody of typical fantasy tropes as well as a stoner buddy movie, and I think it looks a lot of fun. It won't be winning any awards, but sometimes all you want is a good time at the movies, and I suspect this will provide that.
For the red-band trailer, head over to Empire.
Friday, 17 December 2010
The Eye of the World or: The Fellowship of the Wheel of Time
I had considered reading The Wheel of Time for quite some time, but had always been somewhat reluctant, for two reasons. First, the series is ridiculously long; by the time it finishes, it will consist of fourteen books (plus a prequel), with each book averaging about 800 pages. Secondly, and more importantly, nothing I had heard about it had convinced me that it was anything other than standard Tolkienesque fantasy.
I was right on both counts. For a series that has been billed as the best fantasy not written by the good Professor, this is seriously underwhelming stuff. It feels like it genuinely wants to be the Next Big Thing, but is even more derivative of Tolkien's writing than most fantasy I've read, and that's saying a lot. This might not be a problem if it didn't have the pretensions to greatness that it seems to; and it's well-written enough that if it had been half the length it is, I would strongly recommend it. Unfortunately, I can't recommend reading through 800 pages of predictable, formulaic plot, with dull characters who leave little impact on the reader, and where the pace frequently grinds to a halt in an attempt to pad out the book, as if it wasn't long enough already. It takes more than a colossal word count to make your book an epic.
I have to say, it starts very well. The prologue is extremely exciting and gets the reader anticipating a grand, sweeping epic, with a literally eternal battle between good and evil that spans the whole of Time itself. The basic idea behind the series is that Time is cyclic, and the same events happen over and over again, but with such a huge amount of time between that people have forgotten about them by the time they happen again. At the beginning of Time, the Dark One was imprisoned by the Creator; when his followers attempted to free him, a great hero known as the Dragon was able to lock him away again, at the cost of Breaking the World. It is prophesied that the Dragon will be Reborn in the time of the world's greatest need, but that in order to imprison the Dark One again, another Breaking of the World must occur. The premise is a splendid one, and that is one of the great tragedies of this novel: that Jordan didn't do more with it. After this excellent prologue, the narrative dumps the reader in a farming village in the backwater of nowhere, where we are forced to endure 100 pages of people preparing for a spring festival (a long-expected party, if you will). The plot focuses on one Rand al'Thor, an insignificant farmboy with dreams of going out into the world and having adventures.
Now, anyone who has read any piece of fiction in their life will already have figured out that Rand is the Dragon Reborn. Oh sure, he has two friends who are also being hunted by minions of the Dark One, but they are little more than red herrings; desperate attempts by Jordan to preserve some sense of mystery in an otherwise depressingly predictable narrative. It doesn't help that most of the characters, Rand included, are thoroughly unengaging; his friend Perrin goes through some interesting development about halfway through the novel, but it's all but forgotten when the narrative focus flips back to Rand. His other friend, Mat, is the annoying comic relief of the novel, whose one notable character trait is his unbelievable stupidity. The other members of the Fellowship fare little better; most of their character traits can be adequately summed up by their RPG character classes. Other than the aforementioned three, there's a Ranger, a Mage, a Cleric and a Bard. That's pretty much all there is to them, except for the fact that the Ranger is the uncrowned king of a nation at war with the Dark One. Wait a minute...
And this is one of the novel's greatest flaws: practically everything here is ripped straight out of Tolkien, to the extent that if you turn the map ninety degrees, Rand's home and the Blight (the domain of the Dark One) line up almost exactly to where the Shire and Mordor are on the map of Middle-earth. The characters spend most of the novel either walking across country or being pursued by riders in black, and late in the novel they discover a mysterious, skulking figure in rags, completely consumed by evil, is pursuing them. I don't necessarily mind an author using a Middle-earth clone as his setting as long as he does something new with it, but it bothers me when people recycle the plot and try to pass it off as something new; The Eye of the World is one of the most blatant rewrites of the plot of The Lord of the Rings I have ever read.
The novel's other flaw is the fact that it is criminally overlong; it's an 800 page novel with enough plot and ideas to fill 400. As already said, it starts with 100 pages of people at home, and I know it's important to establish the characters before the main plot starts otherwise what happens to them is meaningless, but Jordan doesn't do this. So much of the novel is pointless padding which could safely be cut without affecting the plot in the slightest that it makes me want to throw it at the wall; later in the novel, we get to follow two of the characters walking from one city to another, stopping at villages on the way to rest. They arrive at a village, encounter minions of the Dark One, defeat them, and move on. This happens no fewer than three times, takes up a good 80 pages, and doesn't further the plot in any way. For the record, I don't dislike long novels; each book of A Song of Ice and Fire (one of my favourite series of novels of all time) is longer than this, but the characters are engaging, the plot compelling, and the pace quick enough that you don't notice.
It's not all bad, fortunately. The ending is actually pretty spectacular, and finally delivers on the promises of the prologue, giving a long overdue sense of the epic that this novel desperately needs. After so much tedium, it finally manages to give a sense of urgency to the narrative which had been totally lacking up to that point. It's a shame that it occurs far too late to save the novel. Other than that, the world itself is well-drawn, and the way magic works in this world is actually very interesting. Magic has a yin/yang duality, in that males can draw on one half, and females the other. However, because of the influence of the Dark One, men cannot use it without ultimately going horrifically insane.
It's a real shame. Despite all my complaints, The Eye of the World is not catastrophically bad. I almost wish it were. Its problem is that it's just so formulaic, so standard, so forgettable. I question the point of writing an 800 page novel which brings absolutely nothing new to the genre; everything in it has been done before and better. If it were half the length it is and the pacing were better, this might not have been such a problem; David Gemmell's novels aren't terribly original, but they're exciting, and they're brief, rarely more than 400 pages. I'm told that The Wheel of Time gets better as it goes along, but a novel ought to grab you after 50 pages, not 750. Go back and read The Lord of the Rings again; that's what The Eye of the World is trying to be, but it's unfortunately nothing more than a second-rate copy. So much work was put into this novel, but it's just so ordinary, so... average. And that, in a way, is more disappointing than if it had been outright bad.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)